Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesguy_SJ
It's a shame that in this day and age professional wrestlers don't have an "off-season". Is that a result of a lack of competition for WWE? Or is it just old-school traditions and mentalities that people have always done?
|
From an asset management point of view I can't understand this. It takes so much time and effort to turn a man into a wrestling brand, why would you want to risk having that brand burn out quicker then it needs to? Furthermore, the WWE controls the story line and everything else surrounding the shows, why can't they cycle through the wrestlers giving them 2 or 3 months off a year?