Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyFlame
It's one tiny area in comparison to those being hampered by that access when trying to move East-West. They would still have two access points just not straight out but could get in or out at that location. Sure if they build some big interchange they would solve it but until then let traffic flow for pities sake.
|
The article mentions that the interchange is going to start next spring. The traffic circle is just a temporary measure.
As well, there's probably quite a bit of pedestrian traffic crossing there, that need a light, or an interchange. Considering an interchange is going in, why would one waste money putting in the pedestrian bridge to accomodate the pedestrian traffic that would be required to provide pedestrian access?