View Single Post
Old 09-10-2009, 08:41 AM   #53
Iowa_Flames_Fan
Referee
 
Iowa_Flames_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
Canadian or British systems or Scandinavian systems for that matter could work in the US with very high taxes. But that's not what's bring proposed.

I agree with most of your post about what is being proposed--but this statement about costs is simply wrong. The U.S. system, as it is right now--is far more expensive than the Canadian system, costing 16% of GDP as opposed to around 8.

In fact, the U.S. spends MORE per capita on Medicare and Medicaid--two non-universal government health care insurance programs ("public options", for those who are paying attention) than Canada does on its entire health care system from top to bottom.

The notion that a publically funded system is more expensive than the hybrid system that the U.S. currently has is simply nonsense. In fact, the most potent argument for universal health care is this: it's cheaper.
Iowa_Flames_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Iowa_Flames_Fan For This Useful Post: