Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
This has been explained by countless Creation Scientists. The account of the flood says that 2 of every kind was kept with the exception of a few species where more was kept. In other words the Ark didn't need more than two members of the canine family or deer family and so on. The variations we see since the flood are the variations within species we see today. Also it would make sense for the young to be taken which would require less space. If God drew all these animals to the Ark it would follow that He would have also had a hand in preserving them and dispersing them.
That's because when you look at layers beneath the earth's surface you see millions of years of slow evolution. I see layers of sediment left over by a world wide flood. After all that's how a fossil is formed: the Animal or plant must be quickly covered by sediment to avoid scavengers and allow the minerals to slowly leech in to the space where the bones are slowly disintegrating.
|
If the Ark were true and a mass extinction due to flood took place where is this world wide layer of bones and plantlife? It takes millions of years to turn these things into fossil fuels so wheres the evidence?
Fact:
1) The last mass extinction took place during the Cretaceous period 65 million years ago.
2) The last minor extinction period found in earths layers happened during the Miocene period 15 million years ago and it only killed 30% of the planets life forms.
3) Human beings didn't exist then.
4) The so called flood was a local event and these events happen all the time.
5) Genesis is the most puzzling pile of poo in the entire Bible.