Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Of course it is. The article implies that 0 < his BAL < legal limit. So he had some alcohol in his system, just not enough to be charged. Point being, after this, even though he was innocent of breaking that law, he's not likely to ever drive with booze in his system again. The legality of what they did is an entirely different kettle of fish.
|
So is this like a silver lining?
"Sure, he didn't break the law and is innocent, but this guarantees he'll be innocent next time too. All it took was a tube forced into his penis".
I suppose if you ever get a speeding ticket for going 50 in a 50 zone you'll say "well that sucks, but I'm
definitely going to follow the rules from now on".