Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Of course it is. The article implies that 0 < his BAL < legal limit. So he had some alcohol in his system, just not enough to be charged. Point being, after this, even though he was innocent of breaking that law, he's not likely to ever drive with booze in his system again. The legality of what they did is an entirely different kettle of fish.
|
True. Almost like someone should start a thread about it, citing a news story emphasizing that very issue.