Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
Why would he do that. He wasn't drunk and the blood and urine samples proved that and so did the breathalizer. The police didn't have to force catheterization on him - they could have waited until natured called. Shackeling a man to a gurney is a bit much.
|
Of course it is. The article implies that 0 < his BAL < legal limit. So he had some alcohol in his system, just not enough to be charged. Point being, after this, even though he was innocent of breaking that law, he's not likely to ever drive with booze in his system again. The legality of what they did is an entirely different kettle of fish.