Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Wow, well that's just plain fataed. I'm not sure how a Judge allowed that to take place, it goes against the basic concepts of contract law. It's possible there was a forfeiture clause in the contract, but the resale negates the damages they sued for. Absolutely puzzling.
|
I agree entirely.
Personally, I think if they are able to re-sell the seats the case should be dropped unless the seats had to be sold for a discount.
I understand that they can't make these sort of contracts and have people breaking them, but it doesn't sound like there is any reasonable sort of escape clause. For a judgement to be the remaining value of the contract and then able to resell the seat seems like an incentive for the 'Redskins to pursue that revenue stream. Especially with the wailing list they purport to have.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|