Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnski
These are your words. You were adament that a festival was planned before any lane closures were debated and wanted proof otherwise. I provided that proof by stating that there was a different goal in mind, driven by Druh via (not DUE to) the Plan It Calgary project (and so stated in her own words.) This was NOT because of Plan-It as you said I said in your post below.
|
Plan it has a goal to encourage more people to use alternative transportation, sort of like the point to this festival, is that what you were getting at as Druh having said.
Sorry, I think your original mention of Plan it then was worded wrong, because I saw it referenced in a way that didn't make sense in terms of what I was arguing at the time, and merely tried to correct you on what plan-it was, not anything else.
If that is what Druh said, that pretty much means that this event was being planned before the closure debate ever happened, reaffirming what I said.
Is this just semantics at this point?