Quote:
Originally Posted by flip
I totally misread his post the first time. I thought he said 10 PER cent thugs in the NHL (seemed high but I'd put the NFL at about 30% so it seemed fair).
|
That is an epic misread.
Quote:
I only gave my take on this issue for perspective.
|
Most of your post was calling out my post, which is correct.
Quote:
As for taking a shot at you for the way you worded your post and then calling me a hypocrite I don't know what to say.
Care to post some replies I've made to others where I use pure sensationalism to get my point across without actually giving an opinion or facts with it?
|
I'm not going to spend my time finding posts of your without substance. However your reply to me had no substance. What was the point you were trying to make? Were you trying to make me look dumb?
My point at least got my opinion known. It is not about the amount of words you type that make it a decent post.
Quote:
|
I think everyone is entitled to their opinion but IMO the lamest way of calling a guy out is by using sensationalism.
|
I agree you can have your opinion. But when someone claims there is no problems in the NHL they are wrong. It may not happen as often but the same issues are there, like it or not.
Quote:
|
I only called you out HOOT because I know I seem to get along with you so I figured you wouldn't flip out like some other posters whom I get along with far less well.
|
That's fine we can disagree. I know many of my friends and I don't agree about the same things doesn't change anything.
I believe my reply had just as much if not more substance than the original post. I'm not too sure what you wanted me to do besides write this long a** write-up about all the incidents in the NHL and how they equal the NFL. It would have gotten the same message across in more words.