Quote:
Originally Posted by Tower
You fail...
|
Of course I fail. We all fail every time we get into this nonsense.
Apply just a little bit of common sense to that Harper/Bilderberg comment
you brought up.
It says that Harper attended their event in 2003 in Versailles. Then it says they don't like Harper because he is against the Kyoto Accord, which is their baby.
4 years later Harper is the Prime Minister and he dumps the Kyoto Accord.
Who is controlling who? How did Harper get elected if they don't like him? How can he dump Kyoto if they don't want him to? He's either gone rogue or the Bilderberg people don't actually control him. It
has to be one way or the other. Which way do you think it is?