Quote:
Originally Posted by fatso
no, it doesn't. And neither does the second post I provided for clarification wherein I used the term "after-the-fact". The thread title is relevant to the tone a thread takes, but certainly not decisive. The moderation comment was made a few pages in after the thread got a little heated. That heat, which I think can be a good thing (and was here, though I may be wrong), was totally in keeping with the OP and the thread title.
I'm not criticizing the OP or the other posters in this thread at all. If I'm guilty of anything, it's perhaps exaggerating the civility requested by the moderator. But you're not complaining about that are you?
|
Nope, not at all.
I am pretty sure Ag was criticizing the thread title though, and you supported his comment. If he chimes in and says otherwise I guess I was off base.
It sure looked to me like he was insinuating that people would be upset by Nancy Pelosi being called a moron and that the moderators should expect that based on the inciteful language in the thread title.
I don't think that's a stretch at all.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|