Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
Yes it has been discussed ad naseum.......but it seems like newbies to this thread don't want to go back and read....
The popular mechanics articles depend on alot of NIST investigation, and well, lets just day the NIST investigation is not complete. They did not even address the molten steel that was witnessed by firefighters and confirmed with thermal images on the site of towers 1 and 2.
When it comes to building 7, they sum up the collapse as a "combination of fire and physical damage".........that caused it to collapse like a house of cards.
Who hired NIST?
|
Ahhh, I love the final bastion of the conspiracy theorist.
Sure all of the data on the collapse makes sense, and totally disproves a controlled demoltion, but you can't trust the people that gave you that information. For God's sake, I've got one tiny bit of information that doesn't fit.
Well guess what Mikey, the "Molten Steel" theory doesn't fit a controlled demoltion theory either.
My grandfather had a demoltion company for many years and did some implosions, and there wasn't any molten steel in any of those either.
Therefore, I reject your conspiracy theory because it has one tiny bit of information that doesn't fit your theory.
My new theory, is that the towers were brought down by time travelers using laser guns. Becasue surely laser guns would melt steel.