Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
Yes it has been discussed ad naseum.......but it seems like newbies to this thread don't want to go back and read....
The popular mechanics articles depend on alot of NIST investigation, and well, lets just day the NIST investigation is not complete. They did not even address the molten steel that was witnessed by firefighters and confirmed with thermal images on the site of towers 1 and 2.
When it comes to building 7, they sum up the collapse as a "combination of fire and physical damage".........that caused it to collapse like a house of cards.
Who hired NIST?
|
If the newbies want to participate in a thread then they should read the damn thread, repeating the same discussion over and over again wastes time and band width. Its like walking into a conversation late and asking people to start over, its a rude assumption and a waste of time.
read up on the damage to building 7
http://www.debunking911.com/WTC7.htm