Quote:
Originally Posted by 666DanceParty
Like Larry Silverstein for instance, admitting to Building 7 being a controlled demolition. Like the crash site of Flight 93 and how little sense it made. The list goes on and on and all you have to do is open your eyes to the possibility that maybe the official story doesn't stack up. I think you might be surprised in what you might find out if you allow yourself to.
|
5 years ago called and they'd like their "facts" back. Everything you mention has been talked about and debunked more than half a decade ago.
And ultimately that's why these threads are disruptive to a forum. They basically become a religious topic with the conspiracy theorists preaching, and preaching isn't a discussion, it's one sided. Reasonable people will change or at least weaken their position when confronted with contrary evidence or when something that supports their position has been undermined, but with "Truthers" that's not the case; they'll continue to preach the flawed claims endlessly.
So eventually reasonable people become hopelessly frustrated because there's no actual discussion, and everything goes downhill to insults and bickering.
At the end of the day the mods who volunteer their time aren't interested in dedicating their lives to try and keep the discussions reasonable and on topic when their time is much better spent moderating Flames related threads (unless Sisyphus becomes a mod).