View Single Post
Old 08-02-2009, 10:38 PM   #127
Ice
#1 Goaltender
 
Ice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southern California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
this is such a stupid argument, and one i can't believe gets so much traction in the states. so you'll trust your government to protect your freedom with the military, to protect and serve locally with a police force, to protect homes and businesses from fire, and to educate your children. but yet somehow the government is too stupid to be trusted to provide you healthcare
Police departments aren't run by the federal government, they aren't even run by the state, they are run by their municipality. Its not even a fair comparison to a federal program. Look to Welfare for a perfect example why I don't trust our government to spend money wisely and why I don't want them interfering in my health care.

Education is partially funded federally but ultimately is run by each state. I think we can all agree that public education in the US, overall, is a failure. Teachers unions and special interests care more about protecting their position than educating kids and it shows. Again, using that model, I don't want my state, or any other, in charge of my healthcare.

I'm not saying the system is perfect, but its pretty obvioius neither the US or Canada has a perfect system. I would rather not have my government get involved at this point. I don't think my family pays too much out of pocket for our healthcare. I had my first child for a total of $8.00, that included all my prenatal care through my delivery. Had I not wanted a TV in my hospital room it would've been $3.00. Sure, I had to wait for referrals but at the time I was willing to do that to save money and have an HMO.

Now, with my husband being diabetic, I wanted him to have the best doctors available for preventative care so he doesn't develop the kinds of problems later that diabetics face so I'll pay more for a PPO and more choices. I can't even imagine how his level of care would diminish if my goverment got involved. With all the cancer that runs in my family, I want the best treatment possible should I develop the cancer that killed both my paternal grandmother and my father. I also want to be diagnosed early and my doctor spares no expense on all the early detection testing so I don't suffer the same fate as my family members. For me, its just too risky for my goverment to get involved in my private life when I am perfectly capable of working for what I want and willing to pay the price to receive the care and attention I feel my family needs.
Ice is offline   Reply With Quote