Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5
A high school newsletter has more credibility than the sensationalist crap the Sun puts out. Wait a minute.... maybe your quest of promoting high school kids might not be that bad of an idea after all!
|
With all due respect just because a paper doesn't meet your standards doesn't mean that it doesn't meet other peoples standards.
Just because a paper doesn't play to your sensitivities doesn't mean that the readerships opinions are any less valid.
I hate Rick Bell as much as the next day, but his opinion is as valid as the opinions of any columnist from the Herald.
I believe that the sun outsubscribes the Herald, so if their readership has an 8% approval rate for the bridge then there's a serious problem.
Lets not break this into a stupid debate that peoples opinions don't count because they read a different paper then you, I find that to be a ridiculous elitist argument.
Personally I read both papers every day, and there are things about both papers especially in terms of editorial style and content that bug the crap out of me. However since I read the Sun, and I really don't like this bridge does that make my opinion less valid then yours?