Quote:
Originally Posted by fredr123
http://www.omega432.com/freeman.html
For anyone who is new to this stuff and is wondering what the ____ Tower is thinking/talking about, try the above site.
It cannot be stressed enough however that I DO NOT IN ANY WAY ENDORSE ANYTHING STATED IN THAT LINK AND ANYONE WHO SEEKS TO EMPLOY ANY OF THE TECHNIQUES DESCRIBED THEREIN DOES SO AT THEIR OWN RISK. LOUD NOISES!
|
Thanks for the link... and LOL.
Did a quick search.... seems the courts don't really think to highly of people claiming their right not to be governed by Canadian statutes.
http://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc...08nssc112.html
Paragraphs 13 - 18 are particularly informative.
Quote:
|
from the direct response of the defendants, they have decided that they have the right to refuse complying with orders. The defendants in taking the various positions indicated in the material they filed, clearly and overwhelmingly show wilful and deliberate ignoring of the process plus a clear and unequivocal intent to ignore the authority of the court and it’s order. As a consequence, the only conclusion one can come to is that the plaintiffs are entitled to an order striking the defence with costs....
|