Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
I guess you still haven't familiarized yourself with the relevant Massachusetts case law regarding disorderly conduct... 
FYI, the courts in MA have held that disorderly conduct generally only applies to behaviour designed to incite a riot. Using the word "tumultuous" in a police report a bunch of times doesn't really meet the legal standard. In particular, political speech is always protected--since if it weren't that would be in violation of another little legal guideline that they like to follow down there.
I'd say "why can you not accept that fact?" except.... well, I'll let you draw your own conclusions. |
Why do you never include all the elements of a certain subject you are talking about? That is only one of many elements of the offence. As has been posted multiple times in this thread, it can include many things, not just potentially inciting a riot.
I am done talking about this. You only pick and choose what you want out of the police report. You fail to recognize all the other factors the officer put down in his report, you only focus on the word tumultuous. Why? I have no idea. But for some reason you think that is all the officer wrote and the entire report is based on that one word.
Here is an unbiased look at what may have happened if charges went to court.
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/7/25/185529/493