Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy
The Tiger article is really tough to argue with. Tiger needs to keep his edge on the course, but club smashing and strings of F-bombs seems so... amateur.
|
I don't get that.
On one part of this board the general concensus is that to get Iginla into his game he needs to get mad yet here it's argued that Woods by getting himself into the same intense, angry frame of mind (which has worked for him) is amateur?
I recognise that golf isn't hockey but in the mind of a professional (winning) athlete why is throwing a fit considered amateur if the end result (in both cases) leads to a higher level of performance?
Can we say controlled aggression/anger?