Quote:
Originally Posted by NHL009
Why can't anybody in this thread tell me who was bigger? because you let personal Bias get to you.
It's like asking who is better? Calgary (Johnny Cash or any other artist) or Detroit (Michael Jackson)?
|
It's the way you're going about this that is annoying. It reminds me of those posters that make an outlandish claim (I'm not saying your claim specificly is outlandish) and then sit back and go "okay, now that I've made this claim, it's up to the rest of CP to go out and do some research and present a bunch of facts to prove me wrong, or else I'm right."
Johnny Cash was hugely influencial, and your comments are very childish, and honestly don't sound like they're coming from a 27 year old man. The fact that you're using the fact that you hadn't heard of him before this thread shows how this debate is going to go. I'm not so in love in Cash that your comments about him being a dinsoaur and irrelevent are going to make me upset or lash out at you, however, those comments do prove that you know very little musical history.
Here's the thing, if you knew how popular Johnny Cash was and how influencial was on so many musicians, but just didn't like his music, that would be one thing, and most people would be able to live with that. but to say that he's irrelevent and that you apparantly don't know anything about him is just silly.