Quote:
Originally Posted by HPLovecraft
Not sure if you've read the articles yet, because she didn't appeal. The same judge threw the first case out because he said he erroneously gave bad instructions to the jury, and they needed to do it again. This was after the original amount they chose she would have to pay.
She will likely appeal this ruling, though.
|
Ok - fair enough. I only read about the second case being thrown out.
Then again she could have told the RIAA she was willing to pay the original amount, saving the second trial.
In the end i doubt the RIAA collects anything from this woman. I think they wanted to send a strong message to people who use file sharing places.