06-16-2009, 08:51 AM
|
#241
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Hey look, it's tilting, not falling into its own footprint!
All of this has been covered and debunked over and over.
I admit I was totally wrong about you, I had thought that you were open to reason but you are a die-hard Truther in the end.
I'm not going to go through all of this stuff point by point, because ultimately it's futile. It's been done before, you didn't believe it then (or you won't read it) and you won't now, it's a waste of my time and energy, and circular reasoning is unassailable until the individual is willing to break the circle.
If, rather than only reading things which will confirm your bias, you really want to talk to people who are willing to take the time to go over things with a fine toothed comb I would recommend here, there's a large mix of people including "Truthers":
http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=91
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaneuf3
perfectly into its own footprint? didn't its collapse demolish another nearby building and do 1.4 billion dollars worth of damage to another?
|
Quoting photon and myself cause I'm still curious how this is considered "falling perfectly into its own footprint".
|
|
|