Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
|
Your link has NOTHING to do with building six. It's a red herring to the what we are currently talking about (Building six). You said building six was fine, and should have taken the damage building seven did. I have proven it did take damage.
The difference was size (less weight, less area to hit). It allowed more debris to travel over top of it, and because it weighed less, when they top floor buckled (and you can clearly see that it did) the supports were able to hold it still.
I could ask you the square root of 64 at this point and your answer would be "9/11 was an inside job."
This is sad =\.