View Single Post
Old 06-15-2009, 03:49 PM   #149
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck View Post
You mean the fire that took all of 8 floors on WTC7? China recently had a building, estimated to be 100ft shorter than WTC7 that was completely engulfed in flames on ALL floors and did not collapse.
http://www.infowars.com/fire-consume...-not-collapse/

When you watch the WTC7 building collapse, you can clearly see that the middle of the top of the roof sinks in before the collapse occurs.....thereby making the building fall onto its own footprint and causing minimal damage to surrounding buildings. Quit watching Fox News.
There is not outward structural damage on your Chinese building. No outward structural damage means no weakening on the outer supports that are holding the faces of the building up. Look at the floors in the middle of the Chinese building that are buckling. This is what happened at WTC7, but because the WTC7 building was weakened it couldn't support the weight of the collapse.

I can also bet the Chinese building wasn't as old.

Stop listening to conspiracy theorists who omit facts and science to make their case.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is offline   Reply With Quote