Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86
Negative. There wasn't enough force to take down a building, there was enough force to leave serious structural damage and cause fires to perforate the building which would lead to serious structural damage, especially if they were able to rage through out the day with no real attempts to stop it.
However, what the outward structural damage indicates is that it wasn't an internal explosion that brought about the fires and eventual collapse of the building. It was the pelting of debris that caused the fire and did the structural damage. It was the fire that weakened everything else to allow the building to pancake.
You're out gunned, I'd give up.
|
You mean the fire that took all of 8 floors on WTC7? China recently had a building, estimated to be 100ft shorter than WTC7 that was completely engulfed in flames on ALL floors and did not collapse.
http://www.infowars.com/fire-consume...-not-collapse/
When you watch the WTC7 building collapse, you can clearly see that the middle of the top of the roof sinks in before the collapse occurs.....thereby making the building fall onto its own footprint and causing minimal damage to surrounding buildings. Quit watching Fox News.