Quote:
Originally Posted by Tower
AAAAAAAANd that's why the building fell straight down? Like a tree does when it's chopped to one side? That tree's momentum carries it straight down no? The tree explodes at each "floor"? Didn't think so myself. The force given should have shoved the building down not cause it to collapse on it's side. The NYPO testimony itself tells you way more than your picture....
|
Negative. There wasn't enough force to take down a building, there was enough force to leave serious structural damage and cause fires to perforate the building which would lead to serious structural damage, especially if they were able to rage through out the day with no real attempts to stop it.
However, what the outward structural damage indicates is that it wasn't an internal explosion that brought about the fires and eventual collapse of the building. It was the pelting of debris that caused the fire and did the structural damage. It was the fire that weakened everything else to allow the building to pancake.
You're out gunned, I'd give up.