Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
|
Even just glancing at the article and video I can see huge errors in it.
The level of barium found, if you actually look at the paper with the results on it in the video, is 68.8 micrograms per L.. one ppm is one milligram per L. So this isn't 68.8ppm, or even the 6.8 claimed in the article.. it's 0.0688ppm.. or another way, they found 68.8 micrograms/L, while the limit is 2000 micrograms/L.
And this is something from a jar set out for a month.. impurities get concentrated while the water evaporates, so the actual concentration would be 1/30th that, since it's a month of impurities.
Maybe there's a barium mine nearby? Maybe that's the amount of barium found in the water there?
No one even blinked at the higher lead levels shown in that testing report either.
And that's just a few minutes of looking at it. You might want to find a better source of information than infowars...