I haven't made it all the way through the thread yet. But I'm in the pro-choice, but strictly regulated camp (i.e. not used for birth control).
Because seriously, if you ban all abortion, is that not choosing to save one person's life over another in some cases? Some pregnancies get to the point that you can either save the mother and lose the fetus or save the fetus and lose the mother. Others get to a point where you could save the fetus and maybe save the mother, or save the mother and maybe save the feus. Who decides who has a right to live? Why should laws dictate that a woman with a severe health concern cannot abort her pregnancy to save her own life? Does the unborn fetus have more of a right to live than the mother?
|