Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I'm not even sure how that applies to the post you replied to.
1) Some dude posts some stuff about religious people killing abortionists. It is very on-topic for the thread since the thread is about someone killing an abortionist. He didn't quote any particular post
2) You ask "What is your point? I was talking about pro-lifers, not abortionist killers."
My reply was more my own views. But this doesn't address the fact that you quoted someone who wasn't specifically responding to you and insinuating that their whole post was in fact specifically addressed to something you said.
My reply to your post should have been...
"What is your point? Doesn't matter what you were talking about, he's chimed in with some interesting info anyways."
|
Come on. You know as well as I do his post was directed at something I said. He'd probably say the same.
And yes, it is interesting info. I think they were all at least temporarily insane too.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|