Quote:
Originally posted by Mean Mr. Mustard+Jul 22 2005, 10:20 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mean Mr. Mustard @ Jul 22 2005, 10:20 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Clarkey@Jul 21 2005, 10:58 PM
Maybe 100 people lost their jobs because they tried to collude to fata over Walmart.
I hate Walmart but I applauded what they did in Quebec.
|
100 people wanted health care coverage. I can't believe that you think that there is a huge problem with this. Right now Walmart is the equivant of the coal mine, they treat their employees like crap, the way they do business is downright criminal at times, and well they do all this in order to make a quick buck.
If organizing and attempting to get health care coverage for their families is equiable to fataing Walmart over I really question your perceptions. I guess those people only work at Walmart so they shouldn't be granted the ability to organize and the ability to ask for health care coverage.
I can't understand why you would side with the billionaire employers over the employees who are living under the poverty line. [/b][/quote]
While I have virtually no understanding of the issues in Quebec, so I can't comment on it specifically, I do have to state that your final statement there is nothing more than a very pathetic attempt at generating sympathy for the side you support.
The relative wealth of the employers vs the employees is completely irrelevent. All that matters are the issues and the legal obligations.