View Single Post
Old 05-18-2009, 10:06 PM   #447
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matata View Post
I can't leave this alone, here goes:

The best explanation I've gotten for 'time' is that it looks a tree, with new branches starting whenever an event happens. There has to be 2 (or more) seperate outcomes to this event that can alter the flow of time, yielding one branch for each event. An example for a time altering event would be Japans decision to bomb pearl harbour, they do and loose the war, or they don't and something else happens.

This concept makes travelling forwards in time much more difficult than travelling backwards. Travelling backwards is like climbing down a tree, but going forwards, you have to know exactly what branch to go to and how to get there.

Originally Spock did not want to get too involved since he wanted to keep the timeline intact. He's been in the past before and avoided altering the future, so he was able to return to his time (I don't know the original series too well). The Romulans attack on the USS Kelvin altered the timeline significantly, and Spock realized there was no going back, so he made the best of it.

Again, I'm not trying to turn this into '"I'm right you're wrong" I just think time travel is fun. Heres my primary reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jkxie...eature=related

Wasn't there an episode of Next Gen with Worf where he got time shifted in parallel events after a Bat'leth tourny where there ends up being like 1000 Enterprises from different universes where things were slighty to majorly different? At any rate I don't really care. I understand it for what it is. A excuse to violate canon without a 'traditional' reboot. I think I need to wash off my nerd right now.

Last edited by Yeah_Baby; 05-19-2009 at 10:50 AM.
Yeah_Baby is offline   Reply With Quote