This thread is funny, it seems like there's two sides to this issue, but really both sides are more or less saying the same thing, with one side just emphazing the fact that the kid deserved it.
There's those of us (who are for some reason being labeled as anti police) who are saying...
"yeah, the kid probably deserved it, but regardless, the cop overstepped his bounds"
...and the other side saying.....
The kid TOTALLY deserved, I have NO sympathy for the litttle punk,
but, yeah, I guess the cop overstepped his bounds.
Both sides are saying the same thing, with one side emphasizing that the kid deserved it, and that they have no sympathy, while the other side is emphasizing that the cop was out of line to boot the kid in the head while he layed on the ground with his hands completely visible to the cop.
