Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz
What I'm saying is that I've clearly stated my morals, and given examples of how I abide by them myself. (I'll shoot a deer to eat, but not a coyote for fun). Whether or not others abide by my morals is irrelevant.
What I take issue with you about is that you have claimed to follow one set of morals, but have contradicted yourself several times. (You'll experiment on criminals to save a rat, but let 100 rats die to save a friend).
|
Bumping an earlier argument of mine that was never addressed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer
From where I'm sitting, you [dissintowner] appear to have no ideological base. You flounder from issue to issue and take the "purest" angle possible in any conflict of nature and society and wrap it up with dramatics and hyperbole.
|
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
|