Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
Do you know how many tests fail because they show great signs in those animals but fail when they are finally tested on a person? I understand where your coming from but look at both sides, how do you know that if all that research money had been used to test on life serving criminals that the advances would not be greater then what we have? The cure for cancer, even longer life expectancy, more modern medical miracles? You don't.
|
This is exactly what I was talking about earlier in the thread.
Testing on animals is torture, so its not worth the medical advancements to torture living beings. I get that angle, I don't agree with it but I get it. Life is sacred.
But then you turn around with this garbage, where humans should be subjected to torture and death in the pursuit of medical advancement.
How do you reconcile that with your Life is Sacred foundation? If I have mischaracterized your views, what are your basic principles?
From where I'm sitting, you appear to have no ideological base. You flounder from issue to issue and take the "purest" angle possible in any conflict of nature and society and wrap it up with dramatics and hyperbole.