[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by valo403

I don't think it was ever a mystery that the change in situation was due to the OP, that's pretty obvious. The issue is whether or not the OP has a continuing obligation to pay if that change in circumstances has rendered the contracted services valueless.

If before he moved the company said that they can provide services at the new location it certainly is relevant. The fact that the original contract says A doesn't mean that affirmative acts by the company can't make it subsequently be read to say B. It's not an easy argument without corroborating evidence, but those statements wouldn't be irrelevant.

If they guaranteed it would work, I agree. But I'd be willing to bet it's a "best efforts" sort of arrangement, and it didn't work out, so they go back to the original contract.

Either way, I hate it when peole start threads asking for advice, it sparks some debate that could easily be cleared up if the OP just posted a few details, but they don't so it goes on and on.

Jeeze Rathji, care to clear this up?