Quote:
T99: RE: women voting was prohibited by the US constitution.
|
Not completely true...it was a state decision. There was some wording in the constitution that some states felt allowed for men only to vote...but this point is non-applicative to this debate. Also this was a human rights issue as opposed to a civil rights issue that guns fall under.
Less than 1 year ago the US Supreme Court ruled that the banning of handguns was unconstitutional in DC. This fight has been waged many times...and it keeps coming up with blanks.
Here is an excerpt...
Quote:
3. The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment . The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense
|
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html
So unless the President/Congress/House and the SC all go against the wishes of the citizens....there will be no amendments to the US constitution as far as the right to bear arms.
Now i agree that there is NO neeed for assault rifles and similar weapons to be available to the average joe.
No problem with the second amendment myself tho...and i hate guns.