Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji
If you think none of what I said mattered just because it was a 1/2 game at a casino which is generally populated by idiots, then I agree totally. Truth be told, I did not consider that factor at all.
If you think everything that I said was wrong based on the game of poker in general, then I disagree. You cannot judge a hand based on the final result alone. He gave no indication of the betting or the cards that came down on or after the flop. If you think you can, then I disagree.
|
Ok that makes sense. Your post came off just a little bit condescending and I wasn't sure if you were just posturing and trying to look like a know it all or actually giving realistic advice.
I agree the final result isn't enough to properly dissect a poker hand, except in this particular case. Poker is not a game that is easy to give advice on unless you are there and even then it can be difficult. This particular hand seems relatively straight forward though.