There is no way someone who was not watching the entire game can make an accurate decision about if it was the right bet or not. You can't even get close to figuring it out if you dont have the cards that came down or betting for the hand.
Was someone representing strength? Weakness? Were they aggressive players? Passive? Did someone almost choke on their own tongue when the board paired on the river? How much was in the pot? Would he be seen as over betting if he went all in? or would it be seen as a continuation bet?
Poker is a game of statistics and people. You have not given any of the information about either of those 2 aspects of the game/hand in question so anyone who thinks they can accurately judge his actions as the proper maximal value bet is wrong. Dead wrong.
That said, if he thought either of them had a hand they would bet anything with given their play so far, he probably made the right call. If he had a history of check raising though, he probably made the wrong one.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
|