View Single Post
Old 03-31-2009, 12:13 PM   #46
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTrain View Post
Ok, so it is the outcome then that people are judging him on.

If he had gone into his office for an hour, said, "Oh " and went back to his car to get his child safely, would he still be a terrible person?

Antithesis, if your kid had fallen down the basement stairs and got hurt (or worse) would you be a terrible parent?

fatso, hypothetically speaking, if you got stoned and forgot to pick your kid up at school/daycare, are you a terrible parent?

It's still negligence because you're not being mindful of your child at all times.

If we're thesonly judging e based on outcomes (fatalities) then do we have to say that accidents resulting in fatalities can't happen or if they Kids can't drown. Crash their bikes. If a child dies because a parent isn't 100% mindful are they liable?

I guess the big thing about this story is that the child was dependent on the parent and this ended up getting him killed.
What are you talking about....ITS A CRIME to leave your 2 year old kid in a car alone for 6 hours...end of story. Could not give a crap what his reason were DON"T do it.

Yes its still a crime to leave your 2 year old kid in your car for 1 hour.

As for your examples they are terrible... you compare this story to a child left at day care and or school...? Or a child falling down the stairs.... or a child in a bike accident....

Not to mention the Fireman found the kid at midnight. It was freezing cold outside...

Last edited by flambers; 03-31-2009 at 12:15 PM.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote