Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4
Heh. I'm missing the point? You're rambling on about how the guy is a terrible person. What are you trying to establish? That he's terrible? You've got a problem with the author because he humanizes the tragedy?
And contrary to your feeling of self importance, I don't hang around here to disagree with you. I disagree with you when you're being...######ed.
|
4X4, once again you provide nothing of substance to a thread on a very interesting issue, other than to disrupt a very civil debate. (see your wonderfully insightful and provocative comments in the '######' thread).
I think it's obvious I think you're a dullard so let me try to explain to you what's happening here. Overall K-Train and I are debating whether these acts should be labelled terrible. It seems to me such a definition is first and foremost crucial to even contemplating criminal prosecution. We're obviously on different sides. As for the article specifically, I thought I made it clear I didn't want to engage a discussion on it and that it was merely a launching point for a broader discussion.
That said, what is your endgame here? We're having a discussion. Even if I am wrong clearly what I'm saying is not irrelevant as KTrain and others are responding to it. So what's your point? Why are you worried about my rambling? Would you like to limit the scope of the discussion?