Quote:
Originally Posted by JustAnotherGuy
Since you didn't hear the tree fall then it must not have fallen. But look the tree is on the ground. That is not correct. The tree is standing.
|
Since the point went right over your head, then there must not be a point.
But I made a point.
That is not correct, you have no point, but I have a witty quip aobut a tree.
I didn't say there wasn't a problem. I said that I've never had a problem, but that if there is a problem with the driking water somewhere in Calgary it is up to the city to fix the problem, and that that has nothing to do with providing/selling bottled water in their buildings.
If the water in City Hall is just peachy, why should the city sell bottled water?
If the water is crappy in Forest Lawn, why does that change the fact that the city doens't have to provide bottled water in their buildings.
The responsibilty of the city is to provide safe drinking water.
If it isnt' safe somewhere, then fix the problem. If it's a matter of taste, then that's not the city's problem as there will always be more people that complain than people who praise.
Either way, if the city is doing their job and providing safe water from the tap, then isn't providing water in bottles not redundant, and wasteful?