Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay
They use this as a reason to teach intelligent design? ugh. who isn't in support of teaching the strengths and weaknesses of evolution?
We take a relatively small sample size and generalize it to an entire era of life on earth, obviously there are going to be "flaws' or "mistakes".
but to suggest that Intelligent design is an alternative or competing theory is just mind boggling. if someone can come up with an alternative, scientifically provable theory to how life evolved on earth, i'm all for them teaching it, but to suggest the earth is only 10,000 years is beyond 'wrong' it's just plain insane.
Oh, and in case you didn't know, the stars aren't really there, it's just a blanket god puts over the birdcage when it's time to go to sleep.
|
See, the theory of evolution (like all scientific theories) is being continuously refined as research is conducted over the years and new information becomes available, so it's an incomplete theory and has weaknesses. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that God created life and the universe and Jesus died for your sins.
Good to see that creationism/ID was defeated yet again. How was it that the vote ended in a 7-7 tie? Do they not have an odd number of people on the board, or did one member abstain?