Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
The company is just paying whatever it was supposed to be paying, including retention bonuses. There is no "right" or "wrong" - they pay what they are contractually obligated to pay. They did get the guy to take $1 in salary instead of the $1M or whatever he would have otherwise gotten.
|
But the alternative is the company going under and all jobs being lost (as well with most pay I would imagine seeing as they were hugely in debt). I would suggest that does add an element of right and wrong to it. At least an element of what is truly necessary.