Quote:
Originally Posted by Tower
Umm Thank you?
Nope I really am not a nut bar at all. But I will reference this in the not too distant future!
|
But
why?
Why would you reference it? To
whom? To accomplish
what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
I work in a firm that does income tax, and every year some people believe the whole "we aren't required to pay income tax because it was a temporary measure to pay for WW I" spiel. And then we patiently explain that those people are charged with Income Tax Evasion and lose.
As a matter of fact, here is one from Wednesday.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/st...x-evasion.html
I guess this should also be filed under the "some people never learn" category: |
And the bizarre thing is that it's not as though these folks are just coming up with these arguments on their own. They are, as the links Tower has provided demonstrate, loosely organized. No matter how many times the courts reject these arguments, they keep on being made.
Good on you for your firm's patient explanations. I used to be amused by these types of arguments, but now I've started to lose my lunacy-tolerance. It's just annoying now. Maybe it's time for a vacation.