Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies
One of the (several) points you're not getting is that this is what YOU are trying to do, not the system. The system is the rules. The interpretation of law becomes the law.
You suggest to me a creationist misapplying his "logic" to law - take something out of context, elevate it to a central importance it does not possess, and then argue that it proves something it has no relevance towards. To be specific, as soon as you started talking about how your legal Person is different from the actual you, you went off into la-la land and never looked back - for the purposes of whether or not you have to pay traffic tickets, it's about as relevant as whether the Magna Carta guarantees your right to beat the peasants with impunity.
|
I do understand the system is the law, but the system must follow it's own laws as well. And just because I am not a lawyer does not mean I can not fight or use the The Law & Equity Act, The Motor Vehicle Act, The Income Tax Act, The Bills of Exchange Act and Act accordingly.
It's true I get excited about the meanings and how they can rightfully be applied. It's fascinating and opens many doors that otherwise would be closed to you. It changes your perspective and la la land as you so call it is a dream world. This is not. It is all relevant, but you just choose to believe it is not.
Remittance is a way the City of Calgary/Corporation of Calgary can double dip to get more funds. Believe it or choose not too. Look into it further or disregard it. Your actions and choices mean a great deal to me believe it or not. We are still peaceful people who are capable to do more for our fellow man.
What happens when you legally dissolve your person? If Such Acts are attached to your person and not your Human Being. This is the Biggest deal about the person and has become much more of a reality. The Person was created so you CAN leave the government control. Originally it was created to help man as a shield but now it seems to be used against us to restrict. I agree some laws are good and exist for good reason, but I refuse to eat the corn if it has pieces of poo mixed in that you nor I can not clean out. Law can look at this analogy and make a choice. Change or have no rule over my Human Being unless I infringe on your human being. This is the supreme law in Common Law Canada.