Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
I wonder why the defense would try to argue that because no 'test' was taken to see what his blood alcohol content was, he wasn't drunk, or over the legal limit.
|
I think the defence is suggesting that since they have no concrete proof you can't say he was drunk. The prosecution seems to be trying to prove he was drink by presenting witnesses at the scene who said they smelled alcohol on his breath and the testimony of the offcer that retrieved the vodka bottle from the hopper.