His reckless driving says two things. Either he was drunk, which directly explains why he was so careless. Or he was, and should be charged with 2nd degree murder.
I wonder why the defense would try to argue that because no 'test' was taken to see what his blood alcohol content was, he wasn't drunk, or over the legal limit.
Couldn't the Crown go after him for 2nd degree murder, given that he wasn't intoxicated, and ran that car with a clear mind?
|