View Single Post
Old 03-05-2009, 02:12 PM   #406
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT View Post
So how do these "professionals" connect his brain up again? Do they open him up like a engine and fix'er up?

No, it's the same brain and same person they are letting out. What is stopping those connections from coming loose again?
Bad analogy on the car motor. It's more like trying to fix a computer software problem. They identify what is wrong, then apply new software (chemicals) to try and fix or overwrite the old problems. If the new software is unable to fix the problem... well then he has a long stay.

Can it be guarenteed it will never happen again? Ofcourse not, but if it is reasonable to say it will never happen again then how can you justify continuing to hold him?

And no, what he did when he was mentally incapable is not justification.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT View Post
I just think that the hospital and/or doctor that let's him out should be held responsible for his actions once let out. They may put a lot more thought into letting people like this out if it comes back to them and their job/funding.
If they did everything medically possible, and everyone who looked at him came to the same conclusion then how can you blame that person? If all the medical professionals who know this type of behavior and know how to identify problems feel that he was better, how can you get mad at them? They were doing their job as ordered to the best of their ability.

If you could prove negligence then crucify em.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is offline   Reply With Quote