Tiger's and Roger's situations are completely different. Roger is playing in the twilight of his career and is still a dominant player, it just seems that Nadal is his kryptonite. Roger's been close in a few of the more recent majors he just can't get over that hump.
Tiger is in his prime, as there's no precedent for golfers losing their game in their 30's. There are no real "successors to the throne" so to speak, so I definitely see Tiger dominating for another few years.
Tiger potentially has 20+ more years of high-level competitive golf left in him, while Roger maybe has 2 years left to surpass Sampras.
|